# Overnght acquires the FOSH

**URL:** <https://waterpoloexchange.com/t/overnght-acquires-the-fosh/1981>\
**Category:** General\
**Created:** [November 19, 2025, 5:38pm UTC](https://waterpoloexchange.com/t/overnght-acquires-the-fosh/1981 "2025-11-19T17:38:45Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 20\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![breckweiny](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/c67d28/32.png) [@breckweiny](https://waterpoloexchange.com/u/breckweiny)\
**Post date:** [November 19, 2025, 5:38pm UTC](https://waterpoloexchange.com/t/overnght-acquires-the-fosh/1981/1 "2025-11-19T17:38:45Z")

</div>

Announced this morning on [Instagram](https://www.instagram.com/p/DRPve6rjaaK/?img_index=2&igsh=NTc4MTIwNjQ2YQ==)

Maybe we will see some positive changes in stat reporting in the sport.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![h20wapo](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/h/f475e1/32.png) [@h20wapo](https://waterpoloexchange.com/u/h20wapo)\
**Post date:** [November 19, 2025, 8:27pm UTC](https://waterpoloexchange.com/t/overnght-acquires-the-fosh/1981/2 "2025-11-19T20:27:54Z")

</div>

I always preferred The Fosh to 6-8 Scores.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![polorookie](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/p/a183cd/32.png) [@polorookie](https://waterpoloexchange.com/u/polorookie)\
**Post date:** [November 20, 2025, 2:29pm UTC](https://waterpoloexchange.com/t/overnght-acquires-the-fosh/1981/3 "2025-11-20T14:29:00Z")

</div>

Wow! never heard of The Fosh just looked at it, and it’s exactly how you want to see stats, with players lists. I hope it makes it down to socal we could use real stat tracker like this

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![BB70](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/c68b51/32.png) [@BB70](https://waterpoloexchange.com/u/BB70)\
**Post date:** [November 20, 2025, 4:26pm UTC](https://waterpoloexchange.com/t/overnght-acquires-the-fosh/1981/4 "2025-11-20T16:26:43Z")

</div>

I like them both..6-8 and the Fosh, but the Fosh doesnt show all the collegiate games for some reason??

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![retiredguy](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/r/ed8c4c/32.png) [@retiredguy](https://waterpoloexchange.com/u/retiredguy)\
**Post date:** [November 20, 2025, 4:52pm UTC](https://waterpoloexchange.com/t/overnght-acquires-the-fosh/1981/5 "2025-11-20T16:52:20Z")

</div>

We definitely need HS and club teams in Southern California to wake up and start using 6-8, the FOSH, and live streams.

Even scores updated on MaxPreps would be helpful.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Majored](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/7993a0/32.png) [@Majored](https://waterpoloexchange.com/u/Majored)\
**Post date:** [November 20, 2025, 5:18pm UTC](https://waterpoloexchange.com/t/overnght-acquires-the-fosh/1981/6 "2025-11-20T17:18:05Z")

</div>

I have ALWAYS thought the FOSH is so much superior than 6-8. The ui is so much cleaner on The Fosh. I hope this helps it take off.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![retiredguy](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/r/ed8c4c/32.png) [@retiredguy](https://waterpoloexchange.com/u/retiredguy)\
**Post date:** [November 20, 2025, 5:31pm UTC](https://waterpoloexchange.com/t/overnght-acquires-the-fosh/1981/7 "2025-11-20T17:31:10Z")

</div>

Yes the website for fans is easier to view, however using 6-8 for the game desk is vastly better than The Fosh.

You can teach a young person how to run a desk in a matter of moments with 6-8, which is also vastly better than a pen and paper book.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![WPpops](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/w/7cd45c/32.png) [@WPpops](https://waterpoloexchange.com/u/WPpops)\
**Post date:** [November 20, 2025, 5:34pm UTC](https://waterpoloexchange.com/t/overnght-acquires-the-fosh/1981/8 "2025-11-20T17:34:32Z")

</div>

I am on the other side of the fence. But their purpose is slightly different too. 6-8 is better for player with the performance indicator since the game is about much more than goals and assists. like anything, they are only as good as the stat keeper. The fosh AI piece needs a ton of work. I think 6-8 has a better, more clean, look. Appreciate them both. We need all teams to at least choose to use either.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Majored](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/7993a0/32.png) [@Majored](https://waterpoloexchange.com/u/Majored)\
**Post date:** [November 20, 2025, 7:01pm UTC](https://waterpoloexchange.com/t/overnght-acquires-the-fosh/1981/9 "2025-11-20T19:01:54Z")

</div>

Interesting. I have no experience actually inputting!

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![h20wapo](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/h/f475e1/32.png) [@h20wapo](https://waterpoloexchange.com/u/h20wapo)\
**Post date:** [November 20, 2025, 7:06pm UTC](https://waterpoloexchange.com/t/overnght-acquires-the-fosh/1981/10 "2025-11-20T19:06:15Z")

</div>

Although it also tends to mean that those young players make a lot of errant entries, leading to inaccurate stats.

The UI on 6-8 Scores needs a lot of work. It is often counter intuitive, finding games is difficult and refeshing tends to not reload what you were most recently viewing. It’s gotten better over the years, but still not ideal.

There were some politics involved in USA Water Polo and collegiate programs supporting 6-8.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Majored](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/7993a0/32.png) [@Majored](https://waterpoloexchange.com/u/Majored)\
**Post date:** [November 20, 2025, 7:07pm UTC](https://waterpoloexchange.com/t/overnght-acquires-the-fosh/1981/11 "2025-11-20T19:07:02Z")

</div>

For sure. I find the 6-8 box scores almost impossible to read and find.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![retiredguy](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/r/ed8c4c/32.png) [@retiredguy](https://waterpoloexchange.com/u/retiredguy)\
**Post date:** [November 20, 2025, 8:19pm UTC](https://waterpoloexchange.com/t/overnght-acquires-the-fosh/1981/12 "2025-11-20T20:19:12Z")

</div>

No more or less entry errors than the FOSH — but frankly I’d take a few stat entry errors so that we can actually have some scores online from the epicenter of water polo.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![h20wapo](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/h/f475e1/32.png) [@h20wapo](https://waterpoloexchange.com/u/h20wapo)\
**Post date:** [November 20, 2025, 8:28pm UTC](https://waterpoloexchange.com/t/overnght-acquires-the-fosh/1981/13 "2025-11-20T20:28:57Z")

</div>

> so that we can actually have some scores online from the epicenter of water polo.

Not sure what you mean by that.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![retiredguy](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/r/ed8c4c/32.png) [@retiredguy](https://waterpoloexchange.com/u/retiredguy)\
**Post date:** [November 20, 2025, 8:58pm UTC](https://waterpoloexchange.com/t/overnght-acquires-the-fosh/1981/14 "2025-11-20T20:58:33Z")

</div>

Neither the FOSH or 6-8 has been used much for HS water polo or club water polo in Orange County. It is being used more in Northern California currently which is very helpful to follow teams like Sacred Heart Prep boys.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![h20wapo](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/h/f475e1/32.png) [@h20wapo](https://waterpoloexchange.com/u/h20wapo)\
**Post date:** [November 20, 2025, 11:24pm UTC](https://waterpoloexchange.com/t/overnght-acquires-the-fosh/1981/15 "2025-11-20T23:24:21Z")

</div>

The Fosh wasn’t available to club teams, as I understand.  
As far as Orange County based teams not using any platform, that’s more on the team admins and parents.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![cmbreeze](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/c/c4cdca/32.png) [@cmbreeze](https://waterpoloexchange.com/u/cmbreeze)\
**Post date:** [November 20, 2025, 11:43pm UTC](https://waterpoloexchange.com/t/overnght-acquires-the-fosh/1981/16 "2025-11-20T23:43:25Z")

</div>

If FOSH were to become available for clubs to use, I’d be happy for the news.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![mambapolo](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/b5a626/32.png) [@mambapolo](https://waterpoloexchange.com/u/mambapolo)\
**Post date:** [November 21, 2025, 1:24am UTC](https://waterpoloexchange.com/t/overnght-acquires-the-fosh/1981/17 "2025-11-21T01:24:57Z")

</div>

68 needs Aaaaaa…Lot of work…so difficult to navigate and spotty participation. Overnght must have come to a similar conclusion.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![polofan](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/p/848f3c/32.png) [@polofan](https://waterpoloexchange.com/u/polofan)\
**Post date:** [November 21, 2025, 1:30am UTC](https://waterpoloexchange.com/t/overnght-acquires-the-fosh/1981/18 "2025-11-21T01:30:43Z")

</div>

Would be cool to integrate fosh stats into overnhgt games. And if they have the video should be more accurate stats keeping even if after the game.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![swimcoach](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/e68b1a/32.png) [@swimcoach](https://waterpoloexchange.com/u/swimcoach)\
**Post date:** [November 21, 2025, 1:31am UTC](https://waterpoloexchange.com/t/overnght-acquires-the-fosh/1981/19 "2025-11-21T01:31:29Z")

</div>

I much prefer The Fosh also. Navigating the 6-8 website for scores is really clunky.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![WPpops](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/w/7cd45c/32.png) [@WPpops](https://waterpoloexchange.com/u/WPpops)\
**Post date:** [November 21, 2025, 7:34pm UTC](https://waterpoloexchange.com/t/overnght-acquires-the-fosh/1981/20 "2025-11-21T19:34:29Z")

</div>

I know some like fosh, but during the AF game Leggett has at least 4 shots but it say 0 for 1. Any platform only as good as stat keepers. Also no stat line for field blocks is a miss.
