I’m not an expert of the CIF rules by any means. Having had two girls play HS for a period of 8 yrs total , which over those years had their share of transfers and sit out periods situations, (the school, not my daughters) from the standard 30 days to the whole year, I learned some things of what triggered what. So you may want to consult an expert. There are all kinds of different situations like hardship exceptions, also change of residency and when it happened exactly and why.
Also, if the HS coach is also a club coach, that you would be playing for, the timing of what you join first, the HS team or his/hers Club is critical also.
1 Like
This is only the case once one has attended high school. Prior to attending high school there are no undue influence rules. You could have your 14U coach be your high school coach without any issues even if that meant transferring there. As long as you didn’t attend any high school before transferring.
In response to the idea that the CIF Advisory Board has a say in rules or regulations, as mentioned earlier, the board has had zero input on those matters. Its involvement has been limited to playoff structure and, in the past, rankings. Now, with the new computer ranking system in place, the board no longer has any input on rankings either.
7 Likes
The recent OCR article lays bare what everyone already knew at the time and was the reason people openly wondered how/why the parties involved let it happen and the brazen flaunting of the rules. To be clear, this a critique of the allowed transfer and nothing else.
5 Likes
Very fair point. Doesn’t that bring us back to the central question of what CIF’s responsibility actually is?
What you described is honestly one of the saddest stories to come out of all this. I love water polo and what it can do for athletes and kids, and I want to see that protected.
CIF has a responsibility, just like any governing body. Whether it’s vacating a title, overseeing transfers or enforcing rules, consistency, fairness and accountability have to guide those decisions. Without them, people learn they can do whatever they want, and the purpose of school sports gets lost.
If CIF is responsible for protecting fair competition and the students who participate, shouldn’t the discussion be about how consistently it fulfills that responsibility and what needs to change when it falls short?
That should absolutely be the discussion. I am in a different CIF than the afore mentioned article, and would to begin with how the different sections and their rules are read and enforced. A district close to me treats in districts transfers seemingly harsher than CIF does. Do we know if it is uniform across the state or do we think it is enforced differently in each section?
Of course Newport Harbor is never going to be the example that gets hammered after the fact. Imagine CIF taking away a championship from Newport because of a transfer eligibility issue that CIF itself failed to catch beforehand. The backlash from parents, administrators, attorneys, and that entire community would be enormous. It would turn into an absolute war.
Now compare that to a program like Burbank. Smaller water polo program, nowhere near the influence or resources of a Newport Harbor, and far less ability to fight something like that when it happens. It’s much easier for a program like Burbank to be the one that gets made an example of.
That’s the bigger problem with these rules. If CIF doesn’t have the bandwidth to investigate and enforce them consistently from the beginning, then you inevitably end up with selective looking enforcement where some programs get caught and others don’t. Whether that’s intentional or simply a product of the system, the result is the same: the rules don’t appear to be applied equally.
1 Like
What good does a CIF body do by vacating the title anyway? Everyone from that year that knows anything about water polo already vacated the title and now it’s 
asterisk due to everything that came about. What matters is moving forward what happens next and how CIF chooses to learn and adapt based on the local and national response, community response, and perceptions vs reality outlined in this thread. All the lawyers in the world aren’t going to change what people think now. The facts are out now.
2 Likes
Resources? It’s a public school. Yes it’s a predominantly wealthy area but don’t act like they have the same resources as a school like jserra. During covid , every Sopac member who made it through the first two rounds of ODP got an email stating that they would offer a full ride (tuition, meal money, and transportation). Unless parents chip in, their teams travel on a yellow school bus. Secondly, yes there would be an uproar. I’m gonna try my hardest not getting flagged on here, but I think anyone who has any personal ties to the situation thinks what’s taken place on social media about this thinks it’s way over the top. IMO the only sports where cif is gonna exert its power is where there’s real money involved. Football and basketball. On a real note. This Newport harbor banter is a joke. This is more so rooted in the fact that they’re the team to beat and not on the evidence. They’ve been the best program since Segesman stopped coaching boys at mater dei. 7 consecutive CIF-SS finals appearances and 4 titles in the last 5 seasons. An old cliche that you teach your kids in sports. Winners adjust, losers complain.
2 Likes
Over the top given the offenses? Newport glazing.
3 Likes
Respectfully flipturn, your reply is off topic here. Please respect the rules
This is about discussing consistent enforcement of CIF rules not the vacating of Newports CIF championship. I Whether that happens or not is irrelevant now. People won’t just forget. Most people who are involved in water polo know that things have shifted a lot since Covid and a lot since 2024 as a result of this poor decision, and just because respect was lost for one bad decision, I don’t think anyone wants to see any further harm done to the game than was already done by this. It’s really sad. Let’s please just be forward thinking and let’s focus on how things can be learned so it never happens again. Thinking that it wasn’t a big deal with reputational damage is denial. It’s really bad. This wasn’t the first example and won’t be the last, but this was the “too far” moment for even the most ardent defenders. Vast majority of people without rose colored glasses have finally reached the enough is enough stage
This wasn’t an adjustment or a complaint. This was the first time everyone saw it for what it was and it went too far. Safety first always. “WIN AT ALL COSTS” finally showed the true colors and now the aftermath is on full display in national and local news. Have you seen the reddit community on UCLA, Newport, Waterpolo where posts stay up?
What can CIF do moving forward so this doesn’t happen again? How do these things happen in the first place (being answered quite well by those in the know on this thread) and what sort of reforms can be made. It’s not about restoring reputation to one program. It’s about what’s best for student athletes and learning from an uncomfortable and unconscionable decision that exposed this to begin with.
If “parents chip in”? We’ve all been to Newport and seen the list of sponsors/donors on the wall at NHHS. No one here is buying any argument that Newport parents are having to look thru their sofas to scrape together some coins to “chip in” for anything’s better than a yellow bus. Also, why do you have to drag another school into this discussion? Deflect much?
4 Likes
I agree that it doesn’t really fit the topic. However I was responding to the comments made by Some people on the board. Unfortunately there’s too much political beliefs being inflicted on this specific situation to come to any sort of understanding. That might be a contributing part in the clearance of the specific player whether you like it or not. The real issue is that there isn’t enough money being poured in to protect the safety and integrity of high school sports. I can’t think of a damaging situation where CIF acted in a reasonable time frame or at all.
It’s not political. It’s just the facts.
Let’s stay on topic.
it isn’t about whether someone “likes it or not”. It is obvious that everyone dislikes the actions or they would be committed. You really think someone likes it??? He’ll even non water polo people know now. I have a relative 3 states away who reads the Post like a junkie and now associates it with this crap instead what our sport is really about. Shame on these people. Do you know how hard it is when the only recognition your sport gets is when people pull this kind of crap and it makes national news???
How does CIF adjust from here so what happened never happens again? How do they enforce moving forward with a closer eye? Vacating a title isn’t going to do anything.
We are wasting time on one who caused this when we should focus on the good people in this sport who care more than just about winning. There are programs who care out there. There’s plenty out there who are doing good for our sport that we can’t let one person drag all this down. Respectfully, the best coaches and the best development who follow the rules and focus on student athletes has far more depth and breadth since the 2024 fiasco, a complete stain 
on our sport, and as a result now that everyone has seen behind the curtain. In the long run, exposure is a good thing. People know now.
There are 1 million things more important than CIF titles. It looks like someone is about to learn that the hard way.
2 Likes
well I’d say CIF did a lot better job the following year blocking eligibility for another incoming transfer.
Right and people watch more closely since 2024 and certainly now since August 2026. How can they not? That’s the only good thing from this mess. CIF can and is waking up and realizes that the game is bigger than one person or one program. Good. The consequences of it following and the stigma for the community can be a good thing if it’s learned from. Nobody will forget this and that’s why resumes and reputations exist. Heck, 1 lie erases 1000 truths, so what do you think this did???
So they get taken down a peg or two, so they have to wear it for now, own it, and deal with reality of an uncertain future of rules in the light instead of shadows. That’s the public opinion part. Can’t go anywhere without remembering it now. That’s not going away
Of course, by your logic, it’s a complaint to demand accountability and safety. Please. That’s just silly.
These are a case by case basis. I think a kid who either is expelled or convicted of a crime that would put other kids safety at risk should obviously not be eligible. Most of these offenses if not all would make it illegal for that child to attend school in the state of California. I actually think it’s fair to demand safety and accountability for your kids. The difference in safety between swimming and water polo is embarrassing. For comparison. At a club swim meet, they have an under 18 locker room and a 18 and over. On top of that, they have a volunteer monitoring the entrance. I hate to be the bearer of bad news, but CIF is not “waking” up or going to change. The best course of action is to either get a class action lawsuit against CIF for negligence across all sports, or pass a law enforcing reform for state mandated reporter.
1 Like
We agree on some points and disagree on one critical piece of self accountability especially those with great power already. We have seen what happens. We have the receipts. 2024. Yeesh
You seem to agree with the central point: Hypothetically, when a student transfers or leaves a school under circumstances involving discipline and the safety of other students, eligibility cannot simply be treated as business as usual.
Where we disagree is the suggestion that CIF will never act, so the only answers are a statewide class-action lawsuit or new legislation. California already has mandated-reporter laws, including for school employees, administrators and athletic coaches. CIF also already has eligibility rules addressing disciplinary transfers. The immediate question is whether adults and institutions responsible follow and enforce the rules that exist already.
I hate to be one that breaks it to you, but there is one elephant in the room and you might be too close to it to see it given your earlier glazing. Your position is not how those inside water polo see it that aren’t inside that zone. Saying “CIF isn’t going to wake up” risks becoming an excuse for accepting institutional failure. If CIF’s rules were not followed, CIF should investigate, identify how the eligibility decision was made and impose whatever consequences its bylaws require. Families should not need to organize litigation or persuade the Legislature to pass another law before a governing body can enforce its own rules consistently.
You are right that safety and accountability are fair demands. They should apply even when enforcing them is inconvenient for a program, yes even the one that has fallen from grace now. Nobody is above it. Stress tests exist and sports and institutions grow and thrive or shrink and shrivel in moments of such tests. This is key. Heck, this is becoming the Streisand effect in action now.
EDIT: The below replies were to a poster who was taking things off topic and now that they have been removed, it looks weird out of context. Leaving them up for posterity
I see now. You’re confusing “admitted” with “registered.” Those terms are not interchangeable, and that mistake causes the reasoning that follows to fall apart.
Juvenile adjudication, registration requirements, campus access and athletic eligibility are separate questions for CIF. Attending a high school or college therefore does not establish that the reporting was inaccurate.
Using that mistaken assumption to dismiss the articles is neither factual nor fair, especially when it creates a convenient way to excuse or forget the institutional failures you otherwise agree deserve accountability.
Now that these failures are publicly documented, the relevant question for CIF is what it will change in its verification and enforcement process so the same thing cannot happen again.
**EDIT: The below replies were to a poster who was taking things off topic and now that they have been removed, it looks weird out of context. Leaving them up for posterity
This is way off topic. I think you’ve missed the point, but you know sometimes you just can’t find that common ground. I really don’t know what you’re getting at and frankly, I don’t think anyone here wants to because it gets away from the actual issue and the topic that was presented. There are so many articles detailing the horrifying depositions and the actual wording of what you’re looking for if you want to find it. There is really no disputing anything at this point and it isn’t semantics
This is about CIF and ensuring things like this don’t ever happen again. Sure, vacating a title sends a message, but it’s years old. Nobody cares about that. Everyone who follows water polo knew then it wasn’t legitimate. It is the other boys who were affected. It’s not like anyone thinks highly of these people who committed these acts anymore. The damage is done. Looking backwards to vacate does little.
The real danger of lack of CIF intervention and holding these kinds of things accountable when it gets so much attention, is that the next few years become a race to the bottom for the sport and for high schools. Basically the less enforcement that is done on the major issues, every school begins to compete in this way, and then you have a sport that is harmed even more deeply. Think of it like a broken window. Fix it before things get worse. you don’t want everyone getting bolder.
Let’s move on. If you want to talk about that specific stuff, you’re going to have to start your own post