# House vs NCAA - updates to pending rule changes

**URL:** https://waterpoloexchange.com/t/house-vs-ncaa-updates-to-pending-rule-changes/890
**Category:** General
**Created:** [January 17, 2025, 6:33am UTC](https://waterpoloexchange.com/t/house-vs-ncaa-updates-to-pending-rule-changes/890 "2025-01-17T06:33:38Z")
**Posts on this page:** 6
**Page:** 5

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![mambapolo](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/b5a626/32.png) [@mambapolo](https://waterpoloexchange.com/u/mambapolo)
#### Post date: [June 27, 2025, 7:12pm UTC](https://waterpoloexchange.com/t/house-vs-ncaa-updates-to-pending-rule-changes/890/84 "2025-06-27T19:12:25Z")

</div>

Amazing, the ink isn’t even dry and the NCAA is immediately trying to knee-cap the settlement.

Is it not enough to to create an end-state designed to starve Olympic sport programs into self-funding or extinction? Now the NCAA wants to be protected from running roughshod over any sport that doesn’t line its pockets?

The tide has gone out and we see EXACTLY where the NCAA stands.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Gibson](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex004/user_avatar/waterpoloexchange.com/gibson/32/316_2.png) [@Gibson](https://waterpoloexchange.com/u/Gibson)
#### Post date: [June 27, 2025, 7:26pm UTC](https://waterpoloexchange.com/t/house-vs-ncaa-updates-to-pending-rule-changes/890/85 "2025-06-27T19:26:50Z")

</div>

Stanford may be a bad example as they have intimated several times that they will cut Olympic sports.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![WaterPoloTrevor](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/w/9de0a6/32.png) [@WaterPoloTrevor](https://waterpoloexchange.com/u/WaterPoloTrevor)
#### Post date: [June 27, 2025, 11:23pm UTC](https://waterpoloexchange.com/t/house-vs-ncaa-updates-to-pending-rule-changes/890/86 "2025-06-27T23:23:39Z")

</div>

I find it pretty hard to believe that we are going to get Congress to pass a bill allowing for federal grant money to be used to boost Olympic sports. This feels like a red herring. A “we tried, they said no. Now we will need to start cutting sports to balance our budget. Which sports have the least impact on our alumni donations?”

The issue with this settlement is for schools that play big-time football. That $20.5MM each school will pay those athletes is going to come from somewhere.

Also, I wonder if these people did not have foresight or purposely wrote something that you knew would receive an immediate Title IX challenge. Not sure how anyone conceived that you could allocate a pool of money to spend that didn’t have to be spent evenly.

I think this has the chance to disrupt water polo as schools without football can likely spend more on their Olympic sports if they are motivated to. I can see even revenue sports like men’s basketball being disrupted. Think St. John’s in basketball. They have no football and a billionaire alum who was profiled in the New York Times as being willing to spend what it takes to win a national title in basketball. Now he has $20.5MM he can spend on it versus a North Carolina that has to divide between football and basketball.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Rational](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/r/3ec8ea/32.png) [@Rational](https://waterpoloexchange.com/u/Rational)
#### Post date: [June 30, 2025, 5:24pm UTC](https://waterpoloexchange.com/t/house-vs-ncaa-updates-to-pending-rule-changes/890/87 "2025-06-30T17:24:14Z")

</div>

Wow, lots of questions arise from this:  
So if congress approves helping only Stanford keep water polo afloat - who will Stanford play? Don’t they need competition? Wouldn’t that require funding multiple schools?

Which water polo programs are in trouble via the House settlement? I’m guessing the unsuccessful P4 football schools like UCLA, Cal, & Indiana as they will need to cobble $20.5mm together to _keep up with the Jones’_.  
I’m guessing USC, Mich, and Stan have enough $$ to stay afloat and ASU is safe behind their 70k enrollment - but that’s just a guess.

Do you think the mid-majors FS, Haw, SJSU, & SDSU will be in trouble? I don’t think they have $2mm to spare, let alone $20.5mm, so cutting water polo to save $250k hardly matters.

I’d like to think that the non-football schools (Pepperdine, UCSD, UCI, LB, etc) are safe, but Cal Poly cut their Swim team and it felt related to the House decision, so who knows 🙄

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![rolled1](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/r/ad7895/32.png) [@rolled1](https://waterpoloexchange.com/u/rolled1)
#### Post date: [June 30, 2025, 5:25pm UTC](https://waterpoloexchange.com/t/house-vs-ncaa-updates-to-pending-rule-changes/890/88 "2025-06-30T17:25:53Z")

</div>

cal poly has football.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![jeff](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/j/e19b73/32.png) [@jeff](https://waterpoloexchange.com/u/jeff)
#### Post date: [July 17, 2025, 8:43pm UTC](https://waterpoloexchange.com/t/house-vs-ncaa-updates-to-pending-rule-changes/890/89 "2025-07-17T20:43:36Z")

</div>

A related subject:

> **[Trump mulls EO on athletes' employment status](https://www.espn.com/college-sports/story/_/id/45764381/donald-trump-considers-executive-order-ncaa-athletes-employment-status)**
>
> President Donald Trump is considering an executive order that would require federal authorities to clarify whether college athletes can be considered employees of their schools.

[Previous page](https://waterpoloexchange.com/t/house-vs-ncaa-updates-to-pending-rule-changes/890.md?page=4)
